Do you have streak of writing column ? Why don't you share your expertise and knowledge for readers and let them have the benefit of your knowledge. Click the page "Guest Blogging " show the world your talent. - taxworry.com answers QUERIES done through ASK ME link only. Question by comment system is OPEN to READERS .

Why service tax not collected can not be disallowed u/s 43B ?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: There is a fundamental difference between Sales tax and Service tax. In case of Sales tax , the seller is responsible to deposit the sales tax even if he has not collected that from the customer but in case of service tax the liability of service provider arises only when he has received the value of taxable service from the customer. Section 68  read with Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules  show that service provider becomes liable to make the payment of service tax by the 5th of the month immediately following the calendar month in which the payments are received towards the…

Google Buzz

Can an assessee claim full allowance of deferred revenue expenditure ?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: The nature of expenditure such as advertisement or exhibition, sales promotion or fixed deposit etc. is such that, although the benefit arising there from may extend over several accounting periods, the same cannot be clearly and definitively assigned over time since the same is intangible in nature. The concept of deferred revenue expenditure is essentially an accounting concept and alien to the Act. Deferred revenue expenditure denotes expenditure for which a payment has been made or a liability incurred, which is essentially revenue in nature but which for various reasons like quantum and period of expected future benefit etc, is written-off…

Google Buzz

Is Advance Tax provisions applicable for MAT payment u/s 115JB also?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: At present Minimum Alternate Tax is paid as per section 115JB of the I T Act. In simple terms , section 115JB provides that  in the case of  a company, the income-tax, payable on the total income as computed under I.T. Act in respect of any year  is less than fifteen per cent of its book profit, such book profit shall be deemed to be the total income of the company and the tax payable by the said company on such total income shall be the amount of income-tax at the rate of fifteen per cent. Previously provisions were in section 115J and 115JA . The issue…

Google Buzz

Is keyman insurance on partners of firm allowable as expenditure?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: Any expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the business is alloowable expenditure u/s 37 of the I.T.Act. The premium paid on insurance policy on any employee life is also allowable expenditure. The insurance company sells Keyman insurance policy which basically means  as per Explanation to section 10(10D) as under “Keyman Insurance Policy” means a life insurance policy taken by a person on the life of another person who is or was the employee of the first mentioned person or is or was connected in any manner whatsoever with the business of the first mentioned person.” The issue which came up recently before…

Google Buzz

Can carried forward business loss or depreciation be adjusted with income under any head?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: The law of set off of carried forward business loss and depreciation are different. While section 72 of the I T Act provides that unadjusted loss of a year which is carried forward up to 8 subsequent years can be set off with business income only and not with any other head income. It means that the while current year business loss can be adjusted with income from other head except salary , the carried forward business loss can be adjusted with business income of a year only. Carried forward depreciation loss The rule regarding carried forward depreciaton loss is entirely different than carried…

Google Buzz

Why you need not fill Form 10DB for share transaction?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: Form 10 DB was a declaration as proof of securities transaction payments on the purchase or sale of shares and units. Filing of form 10DB was a must for claiming deduction u/s 88E . From Asst year 2009-10 (FY 2008-09 ) provision of deduction on account of securities tax transaction has been abolished  by instertion of a clause in that section . Please read the section below 88E. (1) Where the total income of an assessee in a previous year includes any income, chargeable under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”, arising from taxable securities transactions, he shall…

Google Buzz

Can carried forward business losses be adjusted against any income other than business?

No, as per section 72 (2) of the I T Act .While the current year business loss can be adjusted with any other head of income , same is not true for the carried forward business loss  . When the business loss is to be carried forward to the subsequent year, it can be adjusted only against business income.It does not matter if the business income may be from the same business in which the loss was incurred, or may be other business. Readers were earlier told that the order of adjustment of losses should also be maintained.

Google Buzz

What is the order in which carried forward losses are adjusted with income?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: Section 72(2) of the I T Act provides order in which lossses can be adjusted. It is provided that the business loss should be set off before setting off unabsorbed deprecation and so on. It is also provided that carried forward business loss will be set off against business head only after the current year’s deprecation, current capital expenditure on scientific research and expenditure on family planning have been claimed.The order set off will be as under : First : Current year depreciation [Section 32(1)]; Then : Current year capital expenditure on scientific research and current year expenditure on family…

Google Buzz

Are provisions on account of warranty claims allowable under I T Act?

Archived; click post to view.
Excerpt: YES, as per Supreme Court. Provisions are generally not allowable under I.T.  Act as these are not actual expenditure. However, Supreme Court , based on the facts and circumstances  of the case in Rotork Controls India P. Ltd v. Commissioner of Income-tax [2009] 314 ITR 62 (SC) held that the provision is allowable as expenditure u/s 37 of the I T Act. Facts of the case The assessee  was manufacturere of  valve actuators. It provided a standard warranty whereby in the event of any actuator or part thereof becoming defective within 12 months from the date of commissioning or 18 months from the…

Google Buzz
More Twitter Followers
Subscribe taxworry.com!

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_VARIABLE in /home1/taxworry/public_html/wp-content/plugins/genesis-simple-hooks/plugin.php(92) : eval()'d code on line 107