Notice: Function register_block_script_handle was called incorrectly. The asset file (/home/71633-55482.cloudwaysapps.com/efjgrqudpm/public_html/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/modules/schema/blocks/faq/assets/js/index.asset.php) for the "editorScript" defined in "rank-math/faq-block" block definition is missing. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 5.5.0.) in /home/71633-55482.cloudwaysapps.com/efjgrqudpm/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6031

Notice: Function register_block_script_handle was called incorrectly. The asset file (/home/71633-55482.cloudwaysapps.com/efjgrqudpm/public_html/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/modules/schema/blocks/howto/assets/js/index.asset.php) for the "editorScript" defined in "rank-math/howto-block" block definition is missing. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 5.5.0.) in /home/71633-55482.cloudwaysapps.com/efjgrqudpm/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6031

Notice: Function register_block_script_handle was called incorrectly. The asset file (/home/71633-55482.cloudwaysapps.com/efjgrqudpm/public_html/wp-content/plugins/seo-by-rank-math/includes/modules/schema/blocks/schema/assets/js/index.asset.php) for the "editorScript" defined in "rank-math/rich-snippet" block definition is missing. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 5.5.0.) in /home/71633-55482.cloudwaysapps.com/efjgrqudpm/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6031
Meaning of "Be entitled to" - taxworry.com

Meaning of “Be entitled to”

Case Name : CIT  Vs. British insulated calender’s ltd. 

Citation : [1993] 202 ITR 354 (bom.)

Court : Bombay high court

Section : 70 to 79

Meaning : The expression ‘be entitled to’ used in section 71 does not imply that the assessee has an option in the matter of set-off of business loss against the income under any other head. That expression simply enables the assessee to set off business loss against income under any other head and, but for that expression, the assessee would not be entitled to set-off of loss under another head in the same year.

Leave a Reply